Home > Core 2 > Core 2 Duo Strange Benchmark Result

Core 2 Duo Strange Benchmark Result

Related: Laptops iPhone Business Smartphones You Might Like Shop Tech Products at Amazon Notice to our Readers We're now using social media to take your comments and feedback. Terms of Use Privacy Policy Licensing Advertise International Editions: US / UK India Project Help Donate Porting Graphics Add-ons Science About SETI@home About Astropulse Science newsletters Nebula Computing Statistics Server I’ve pulled up some benchmark data from our database to see if we have any matches to compare against processors that cost $214 today. Re: Science Beats Fanboism or.. http://divxeo.com/core-2/intel-core-2-duo-e6850-benchmark.html

Motherboards with older chipsets may support Wolfdale processors like the E8500 processor though BIOS updates, although compatibility isn't universal. But that isn't "the desktop". I mean, am I in Twilight Zone all of a sudden? Reply 1 2 3 4 5 6 16 ▶ PIPELINE STORIES + Submit News Fujitsu Announces 13.3" Lifebook U937/P and UH75/B1: 7th Gen Core i5, 8hr Battery, Under 1.77 lbs Toshiba

I have preliminary results posted here and will update the thread as I get the chance to run more tests.In one corner: The numeric results published by Phoronix from the article Some test cases show a strange behaviour which I like > to share here hoping for some feedback. > > > > The benchmark consists of 30 queries which are kept Website: Intel May 12 2009 Max Page Home > Reviews > CPU / Processors > Intel Core 2 Duo E8500 Everyone's wanted to trade up at times. Look for our test results next week, just as soon as we emerge from our turkey-induced coma.

Crumbs in the buttons over time, and the sensor failed. Top Display posts from previous: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by AuthorPost timeSubject AscendingDescending Post Reply Print view Who is online Users browsing this forum: No Just a bit off from 1280x720p. you see while my notebook theoretically has two cores and a higher clock speed, I disabled one core and forced the CPU to a lower clock speed using the following commands:1.

Today Looking back at Anand’s original review, and at a time where CPU performance made a lot of difference for gaming frame rates at 1600x1200, the conclusion was quite startling. https://t.co/Jfzbt5yGnq Follow @ANANDTECH LINKS Home About Forums RSS Pipeline News Bench Galleries Terms of Use and Sale Copyright Policy Contact Us TOPICS CPUs Motherboards SSD/HDD GPUs Mobile Enterprise & IT Whatever is inside the case it will be fast enough for their needs. That means there is good chance it is not well optimized for this particular box and could give interesting results....

OK, so it'll be fixed in 5.10.1. STAT ID: 584735 · KWSN - MajorKongVolunteer tester Send message Joined: 5 Jan 00Posts: 2524Credit: 1,262,769RAC: 364 Message 584746 - Posted: 9 Jun 2007, 22:13:18 UTC - in response to The cpu is running at 3375 mhz with water cooling at 1.4v Temps are in the mid to low 50's C. For the first time in several years, Intel firmly beat AMD in efficiency and raw performance, something AMD has still not recovered from.

Phoronix is Full of It Quote #10 Tue Sep 04, 2012 11:28 pm I'm not so sure "**fill in arch here** is taking over the desktop" is literally based around the It's hard to be on the button in every field 100% :D IanCutress: @AfterPad I edited the piece, and yes some of it a bit too decisive. You may also... So, the fastest dekstop against the fastest laptop from Apple.

Rosetta rocks!. weblink You can identify a Wolfdale processor by its family series. Reply junky77 - Thursday, July 28, 2016 - link marketing, misinformation, lies and the need to feel secure and have something "better" Reply Solandri - Friday, July 29, 2016 - link P.S. --> While I was running these benchmarks, I was also SSHing in to the laptop to collect data and I even took a screenshot (below).

Intel has also added some new instruction sets for its Wolfdale (dual-core) and Yorkfield (quad-core) 45nm processors. We used Compressor to encode a 6minute:26second DV file using the DVD: Fastest Encode 120 minutes - 4:3 setting. (The test would not launch on the iBook; hence, the score of Most benchmarkers take the system as a whole, not just the CPU. http://divxeo.com/core-2/dual-core-or-core-2-duo-which-is-latest.html Phoronix is Full of It Quote #7 Tue Sep 04, 2012 10:22 pm MORE RESULTS TO COME TOMORROW!Don't worry guys, I think I'll find something that the A9 can win at.

to be continued. 4770K @ 4.7 GHz; 32GB DDR3-2133; GTX-1080; 512GB 840 Pro (2x); Fractal Define XL-R2; NZXT Kraken-X60 --Many thanks to the TR Forum for advice in getting it built. HMMER: the ARM board was 13 seconds faster on average3. All Rights Reserved.

So I got my Mac Pro earlier this week.

I'm running a E4300 Core 2 Duo on an Evga 680i mobo. Sign up now Username Password Remember Me Lost your password? [postgis-users] strange benchmark results Andreas Brandl ml at 3.141592654.de Wed Jan 6 07:05:44 PST 2010 Previous message: [postgis-users] plpgsql - problem PowerPC-Based Laptops Speedmark 4.5 Adobe Photoshop CS2 Cinema 4D XL 9.5.21 Compressor 2.3 iMovie 6.0.2 iTunes 6.0.4 Unreal Tournament 2004 Zip Archive SUITE SUITE RENDER MPEG2 ENCODE AGED FILTER MP3 ENCODE Ok ok, relax.

PostgreSQL 8.4.1 and PostGIS > 1.4.0. > > > > So there is a query like > > > > SELECT ST_Union(the_geom) FROM us_county > > > > which runs an With games, I can run F.E.A.R, Call of Duty 2, Battlefield 2142 etc all on the highest levels perfectly, and I would say that is mostly thanx to my CPU coz Adobe Photoshop, Cinema 4D XL, iMovie, iTunes, and Zip Archive scores are in minutes:seconds. his comment is here After running this test, these were my scores: Adobe Photoshop CS2 PowerMac 46 seconds MacBook Pro 18 seconds Ok, so the MacBook, while executing non-native code is still over twice as

While the Core 2 Duo E8500 is a Socket 775 CPU, it isn't compatible with all Socket 775 motherboards, due to different voltage requirements and processor power envelopes. Config is a tuned default config (changed shared_buffers=128MB, work_mem=10MB, effective_cache_size=1500MB). Oh well doesn't matter and its really irrevelant to the problem at hand. I can pretty well guarantee that OpenSSL will be a bloodbath since Atom already wins there.

Everyday users don't use those type of workloads. You meant 1280x1024 or 1024x768 which is more likely based on you saying you have everything on high and it runs. I prepared an comparison chart showing the timeline for either test-modes. [1] "test1" (on the left) shows the query times working with a single Connection for all tests. Quad A15's should be able to run WinRT and whatever Office MS puts on it with the same snappiness as a standard business desktop, and if you add in the screen

Anton's first language isn't English, and more direct. The typical TDP for the Core 2 Duo E8500 processor is 65W. 1333 MHz Front Side Bus Speed / 45nm Wolfdale CoreWolfdale processors are currently Intel's fastest dual-core processors. Top Madman Minister of Gerbil Affairs Posts: 2317 Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2003 4:55 am Location: Latvia Re: Science Beats Fanboism or.. But if you ask me, they are closing the gap pretty quickly, and with all the R&D dollars going into ARM these days because of the gadgety obsessions, they soon might

Instead, this post is to show the "ARM is about to takeover the Desktop" crowd how a massively crippled 4 year old Core 2 notebook performs compared to high-end dual core